Free initial call
Whether the work is within our competence at all.
In the UK anyone may call themselves an engineer, with any training or none. CEng and IEng are protected and require registration you can verify. So we publish what we hold, and we turn down work outside our competence.
Scope and assumptions written down, and commissions outside our competence declined rather than attempted.
Independent review of designs, calculations, specifications or proposals.
See the programCalculations and technical assessment, with the inputs and assumptions recorded.
See the programAssessment of existing structures, with unexamined elements listed rather than assumed sound.
See the programTechnical opinion for owners, purchasers and advisers, within a stated scope.
See the programAssess competence before accepting a commission, write the scope and assumptions into the output, list what could not be inspected, and decline to certify what only a building control body can.
Whether the work is within our competence at all.
What is included, excluded and assumed.
With the inputs and their sources recorded.
Including what would invalidate the conclusion.
Quoted per commission after an initial call. Surveys, opening up and specialist testing by others are separate.
One set of documents or one question.
Calculations, assessment or ongoing technical support.
Said plainly, because competence duties apply.
Every engagement is quoted after a free consultation. No subscription.
KH Technical Services Ltd is a private limited company registered in England and Wales under company number 14309757, based at Virginia Water in Surrey and trading since August 2022. The work is engineering related scientific and technical consulting, and other engineering activities: technical review, calculations and assessment, work on existing structures, and independent opinion.
Clients reasonably assume the word engineer carries a qualification behind it. In the United Kingdom it does not: the title is unprotected and anyone may use it. What is protected is registration with the Engineering Council as a Chartered Engineer, Incorporated Engineer or Engineering Technician, and that registration is verifiable on a public register. So we publish what is actually held rather than leaning on a word that signals nothing. Alongside that, the competence duties attaching to building work require a designer to decline an appointment they are not competent to carry out, and we do. We are also not a building control body: we do not certify Building Regulations compliance or statutory approval, and we say so rather than letting a report be read as a certificate.
Correct, and it surprises most people. In the UK anyone may describe themselves as an engineer regardless of training. What is protected is Engineering Council registration — Chartered Engineer, Incorporated Engineer, Engineering Technician — which requires assessment and appears on a public register. Ask anyone claiming CEng or IEng for their registration and check it. That includes us.
No. We are not a building control body and not an approved inspector, and statutory approval is a decision for the building control body. We can give a reasoned engineering opinion on whether something appears to meet a particular requirement, and we will state clearly on the document that it is an opinion rather than a certificate, because the two get confused with real consequences.
Because the competence duties on building work require a designer not to accept an appointment for work they are not competent to carry out, and because it is the right answer anyway. If a commission needs a discipline or a level of specialism we do not have, taking it on helps nobody. We will say so at the first call and point you somewhere better.
No, and this is the most common misunderstanding about engineering outputs. An assessment is valid only for the assumptions and the scope stated in it. Change the loading, the use, the layout or the information it relied on, and it needs revisiting. We write that into the document so nobody relies on it beyond its basis.
Not honestly. Concealed elements, previous alterations and historical loading often cannot be established without opening up, so we list what we could not inspect rather than treating it as adequate. If the question genuinely matters, opening up is the answer, and we will say so even though it adds cost and time.
We will use the survey, drawings and loadings you supply, and we do not independently verify them unless you instruct us to. That is normal practice and worth being explicit about, because an assessment built on inaccurate inputs is wrong however good the calculation is. We record which figures came from where.
A free initial call to establish whether it is within our competence.